Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 So. 2d 160 - Proctor v. State

480 So. 2d 160 - Proctor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure · Frank v. State · Miranda v. Hance Construction Co. · 478 So. 2d 842 - Ehrenshaft v. State · 453 So. 2d 919 - Sampson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]uthorizes the trial court upon revocation of probation to increase a defendant's sentence to the next higher guidelines cell without explanation, but precludes an increase of the sentence beyond one guidelines cell unless the court states clear and convincing reasons for such departure other than the fact that the defendant violated probation. (emphasis supplied).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.