480 So. 2d 192 - Miller v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1987
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 464 So. 2d 538 - Walter v. Walter · 464 So. 2d 542 - Marcoux v. Marcoux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... in the context of domestic relations law, is another way of saying that the trial court acted unreasonably and abused its discretion ... [However,] if there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the award, there is logic and justification for it and it is unlikely that no reasonable person would adopt the view taken by the trial court. Under these circumstances, there is no abuse of discretion and the award must be affirmed. (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.