State v. Street’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2006
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · Whalen v. United States · State v. Hogan · 448 So. 2d 645 - State v. Davis · 337 So. 2d 475 - State v. McCarroll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n accused is entitled to know in advance of trial by receipt of a written notice from the prosecutor that the state intends to invoke art. 893.1 by calling on the trial judge prior to sentencing to make a finding that a firearm was used in the commission of the charged felony.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“since the Legislature in passing LSA-R.S.14:94 has in that very statute prescribed a punishment for a weapon, we presume that it must not have intended that the identical conduct. . . . should trigger a more harsh punishment than that prescribed for the same act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“this section shall apply even in those cases where the use of a firearm is an element of the offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.