State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 443 So. 2d 522 - State v. Sweeney · 450 So. 2d 621 - State v. Jackson · State v. Weston · 416 So. 2d 97 - State v. Talbert · 285 So. 2d 234 - State v. Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is highly improper to ask a potential juror if he would act in a particular way under certain circumstances because such a question seeks to commit him in advance as to his verdict. That type of question is related to the merits of the case rather than to the proper subject of voir direthe qualifications of the juror. [citations omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pedroso
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.