480 So. 2d 66 - State v. Pybus’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Matlock · Bumper v. North Carolina · United States v. Smith · 337 So. 2d 171 - Herriott v. State · 390 So. 2d 1136 - Whitener v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state bears the burden of proving, by clear and positive testimony, that the consent was, in fact, freely and voluntarily given. The testimony must prove there was no duress or coercion, either express or implied, and that the consent was specific, unequivocal, and freely and intelligently given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he question whether a consent to search was in fact `voluntary' or was the product of duress or coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.