Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 U.S. 228 - Martin v. Ohio

Martin v. Ohio’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

870
cited by 870 later decisions
36
cited 36 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

203 federal appellate · 28 district · 431 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 870 later decisions (36 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), Walton v. Arizona (1990)

203 federal appellate · 28 district · 431 state decisions — followed in 34 states

340019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Francis v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 870 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in deciding whether there was a reasonable doubt about the sufficiency of the state's proof of the elements of the crime.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “indeed, 'all circumstances of justification, excuse, or alleviation'--rested on the defendant.... This was the rule when the Fifth Amendment was adopted, and it was the American rule when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “purposely, and with prior calculation and design, caus[ing] the death of another.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.