Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 U.S. 321 - Arizona v. Hicks

Arizona v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2,664
cited by 2,664 later decisions
27
cited 27 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

794 federal appellate · 136 district · 1,204 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,664 later decisions (27 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Horton v. California (1990), Wilson v. Layne (1999)

794 federal appellate · 136 district · 1,204 state decisions — followed in 49 states

1.1k019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Cortez

Cited together with Horton v. California · Texas v. Brown · Terry v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Katz v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,664 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable.”
    72 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Dispensing with the need for a warrant is worlds apart from permitting a lesser standard of cause for the seizure than a warrant would require, i.e., the standard of probable cause. No reason is apparent why an object should routinely be seizable on lesser grounds, during an unrelated search and seizure, than would have been needed to obtain a warrant for that same object if it had been known to be on the premises.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “there is nothing new in the realization that the Constitution sometimes insulates the criminality of a few in order to protect the privacy of us all.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.