Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 U.S. 709 - O'CONNOR v. Ortega

O'CONNOR v. Ortega’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

1,956
cited by 1,956 later decisions
44
cited 44 times by the Supreme Court
38
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

640 federal appellate · 195 district · 381 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,956 later decisions (44 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. (1989), Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987)

640 federal appellate · 195 district · 381 state decisions — followed in 38 states

607019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Katz v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois

Cited together with New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Katz v. United States · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab · Griffin v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,956 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he operational realities of the workplace,”
    96 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement, make the warrant and probable-cause requirement impracticable.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Determining the reasonableness of any search involves a twofold inquiry: first, one must consider 'whether the ... action was justified at its inception,' ...; second, one must determine whether the search as actually conducted 'was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place,'....”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.