Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 A.2d 1037 - In Re TLS

In Re TLS’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2017

20 state decisions

1401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Anthony v. United States · United States v. Phillips · Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]efore a child may be removed from the parental home at the dispositional stage, there must be convincing proof and findings that the parents are unfit and demonstrably incapable of providing an appropriate home, and that separation is necessary for the child's welfare or in the interest of public safety. It is crucial that findings indicate to the parties and to this Court, if an appeal is taken, what was decided and how the decision was reached.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “disclo[sing] that throughout the lives of the two children, the mother ha[d] shown a complete inability to cope with the stress of parenting. Her tendency ha[d] been to react to that stress with abusive and neglectful conduct toward the children.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re RM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.