Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 A.2d 772 - State v. Guptill

State v. Guptill’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2012

9 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. True · Rohlfing v. State · State v. Hamilton · State v. Hubbard · State v. York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “5. Unless otherwise expressly provided, a person is not an accomplice in a crime committed by another person if: C. He terminates his complicity prior to the commission of the crime by (1) informing his accomplice that he has abandoned the criminal activity and (2) leaving the scene of the prospective crime, if he is present thereat.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.