Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 F.2d 22 - United States v. Valot

United States v. Valot’s Empirical Analysis

481 F.2d 22 · 1973

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
April 2013
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. Pope (1977), United States v. Gore (1998)

34 federal appellate · 1 district ·

24019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 955

Relies on Gore v. United States · Heflin v. United States · Prince v. United States · Milanovich v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant has conceded his promise of cooperation. This is the only relevant fact. To give him an opportunity to fulfill his promise, he was released on his own recognizance. He had a mission, namely, to assist the government in enforcing the drug laws. This might have taken a week, a month, or a year to accomplish. For the appellant even to claim that the period of cooperation applies to the Speedy Trial Rules offends reason; to use his own unconscionable perfidy as a basis for such a claim is even worse.” (Valot, supra, 481 F.2d at 25 ) (emphasis supplied).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for any person to bring or possess on board any vessel or aircraft ... arriving in ... the customs territory of the United States, a controlled substance in schedule I or II or a narcotic drug in Schedule III or IV, unless such substance or drug is a part of the cargo entered in the manifest or part of the official supplies of the vessel, aircraft or vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Id. 60 By the same logic utilized in Valot, we conclude that Congress, in enacting § 401 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.