Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 F.2d 387 - Snider v. All State Administrators, Inc.

Snider v. All State Administrators, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

481 F.2d 387 · 1973

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Arroyo v. United States · Jones v. Illinois ex rel. Electoral Board · Whirl v. Kern

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “restrain violations of this section . . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “district court jurisdiction under Section 302(e) is limited to restraining future violations of the statute ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Trust funds for the benefit of union members are established under the laws of the respective states. Federal law affects union trust funds only to the extent that Congress has elected to exempt employer contributions to such funds made under the terms of a labor-management contract from the general prohibition on employer payments to employee organizations. While Congress thought it necessary in order to prevent potential abuse of this exemption to stipulate the conditions under which payments can legally be made, State authority remains the legal foundation upon which such funds are constructed.” 481 F.2d at 390 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.