Jeffries v. Sugarman’s Empirical Analysis
481 F.2d 414 · 1973
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 630 · 42 U.S.C. § 633
Relies on New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino · Brewer v. United States · 348 F. Supp. 290 - Dublino v. New York State Department of Social Services · 325 F. Supp. 1162 - Woolfolk v. Brown · Woolfolk v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Supreme Court's acknowledgement that the states have some latitude in formulating their own employment rules, * * * may indicate that such inconsistencies with the federal law as will justify invalidation must be more substantial than suggested by the district courts in either Dublino or the instant case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woolfolk v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.