Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, District Local No. 540 v. Neuhoff Bros. Packers, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
481 F.2d 817 · 1973
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Executone Information Systems, Inc. v. Davis (1994), International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, District 776 v. Texas Steel Co. (1976)
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc. · Safeway Stores v. American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union, Local 111 · Local 453 v. Otis Elevator Company · Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. Washington Post Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he arbitrator has great flexibility and the courts should not review the legal adequacy of his evidentiary rulings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The scope of judicial review of an arbitrator's award is extremely narrow: In order to promote the federal policy favoring settling of labor disputes by arbitration the factual and the legal accuracy of arbitrators' findings will not be reviewed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.