Tostado v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis
481 F.3d 1012 · 2007
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lopez v. Gonzales · YANEZ · Lopez v. Gonzales · 127 S. Ct. 936 - Beckworth v. Alabama · Tostado v. Carlson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the BIA's legal determination de novo, according substantial deference to the BIA's interpretation of the statutes and regulations it administers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ahmed v. Sessions“interpretation of federal criminal statutes de novo without according any deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ahmed v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.