Miller v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
481 F.3d 468 · 2007
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2025
6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Bell Warden v. Cone · Wallace v. Kato · Patrasso v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'non-representation, not poor representation, triggers a presumption of prejudice.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Polk v. State · State v. Z.M.“the standard is extremely high for a petitioner asserting that his counsel entirely failed to subject the prosecution's case to meaningful adversarial testing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Polk v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.