Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 F.3d 639 - Kalda Md

Kalda Md’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Hamby v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. (2010), 884 F. Supp. 2d 261 - Solis v. Koresko (2012)

7 district ·

190200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Christensen v. Harris County · Varity Corporation v. Howe · Pegram v. Herdrich · Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] person is a fiduciary with respect to a plan to the extent (i) he exercises any .discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting management of such plan or exercises any authority or control respecting management or disposition of its assets, (ii) he renders investment advice for a fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, with respect to any moneys or other property of such plan, or has any authority or responsibility to do so, or (iii) he has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of such plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n ERISA fiduciary must `discharge his duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries,' 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (a)(1)(A), and must comply with the common-law duty of loyalty, including the `obligation to deal fairly and honestly with all plan members.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ERISA does not prohibit an employer from acting in accordance with its interests as employer when not administering the plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.