481 F. Supp. 1211 - Tepper v. Galloway’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Garnishment and attachment remedies afford the actual or potential judgment creditor a means of assuring, under appropriate circumstances, that the debtor will not remove from the jurisdiction, encumber, or otherwise dispose of certain assets then available to satisfy the creditor’s claim. North Georgia Finishing Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601, 610 [ 95 S.Ct. 719, 724 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 ] (Powell, J., concurring). * * * In contrast, Taylor Law penalty deductions are not intended to preserve assets pending ownership determination. Rather they are intended to be penal in nature. The state’s interest in applying penalty deductions against striking employees is clearly different than the state’s [or federal] interest in safe-guarding the assets of debtors prior to judicial determination of ownership.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 534 F. Supp. 94 - Kornit v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PLAINVIEW-OLD BETHPAGE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

2. “no affected employee would be permitted to claim that deductions made after the 90 day statutory period are illegal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Cheeseman v. Carey