Morton v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Dann v. Johnston · Hephner v. Mathews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Ruling on the transcript and pleadings constitutes final disposition of the cause, and cannot properly be labeled summary within the contemplation of Rule 56.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is not technically correct or necessary under ... 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.