Commonwealth v. Arias’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona · Arizona v. Hicks · Brigham City v. Stuart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when probable cause exists to believe that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or will occur imminently, warrantless entry is justified only if exigent circumstances also are present”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may be justifiable, . . . if the circumstances of the search fall within an established exception to the warrant requirement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the basis of the 911 caller's firsthand knowledge was apparent from the initial tip itself”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.