Herman v. Berrien County’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“every ... word in the statute must be read and understood in its grammatical context,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we must consider both the plain meaning of the critical word or phrase as well as its placement and purpose in the statutory scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the language of the statute is unambiguous,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.