Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 Mich. 352 - Herman v. Berrien County

Herman v. Berrien County’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “every ... word in the statute must be read and understood in its grammatical context,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “we must consider both the plain meaning of the critical word or phrase as well as its placement and purpose in the statutory scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the language of the statute is unambiguous,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.