Kirby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dorton v. State · Grooms v. State · Tabor v. State · Green v. State · McCraney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant cites Cross v. State (1979), 272 Ind. 223 , 397 N.E.2d 265 for the proposition that when a court fails to substantially comply with a venire selection procedure then a remand is required. We find Cross is not applicable. The issue in the case at bar is not the method of selecting jurors but rather the venue or location of the jury pool. Appellant does not argue error in the method used to select individual jurors or in the method used to form the potential pool from the citizens of either county. In essence he contends he was entitled to a jury pool consisting of only Marshall County citizens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirby v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.