Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 NW2D 227 - State v. Ganje

State v. Ganje’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thor v. United States · Roussell v. Jeane · State v. Hilling · United States v. Hernandez-Gonzalez · State v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Notwithstanding any statute or rule to the contrary, the defendant in any criminal proceeding may subpoena, without cost to the defendant, the person who conducted the chemical analysis referred to in this section to testify at the trial on the issue of the amount of alcohol, drugs, or a combination thereof in the defendant’s blood, breath, saliva, or urine at the time of the alleged act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.