Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 P2D 144 - Southeastern, Inc. v. Doty

Southeastern, Inc. v. Doty’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2023

1 district · 11 state decisions

70197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter · Todd v. Orr · Manuel v. Kidd · Harden v. District Court of Tulsa County · Simpkins v. Parsons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Within thirty (30) days after the rendition of a judgment, the court, of its own initiative or on motion of a party, may correct, open, modify or vacate the judgment. The court may prescribe what notice, if any, shall be given.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 1031.1 is an obvious substitute for the old “term time rule.” It is a rule of practical necessity. In Todd v. Orr (1914), 44 Okl. 459 , 145 P. 393 , we observed that the term time rule is of far-reaching importance. We said that a tri al court must have some power to correct its errors, and concluded “Any other view would so fetter and paralyze the power of the courts that they must frequently do wrong, from mere inability to do right.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]n such case this court will, absent substantial reasons, stay the appeal ... pending final disposition of the case in the trial court conducted under the authority of Section 1031.1, and until a second petition in error embracing the new matter is filed in the same case in this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.