IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
GREGG CHAMBERS, AN INDIVIDUAL, No, 82398
Appellant,
vs.
EUGENE TUMBARELLO, AN
FILED
INDIVIDUAL; AND SHAMROCK MAR 0 1 2021
PAINTING, INC., ELIZA; A. BROWN
PREME •
Res • ondents.
BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion
to quash a bench warrant) Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County;
Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.
Respondents move to dismiss this appeal for lack ofjurisdiction.
They contend the challenged order is not substantively appealable.
Appellant opposes the motion. He argues that the order is appealable as a
special order after final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(8) because it was
entered after the final judgment.2 We disagree with appellant.
"[Mot all post-judgment orders are appealable." Burton v.
Burton,
(1983). An appealable special
order after final judgment is an order that affects the rights of a party to
the action growing out of the previously entered judgment. Gamin v.
Mainor,
(2002). Here, the order
1The clerk shall modify the caption of this appeal consistent with the
caption on this order.
2Appellant's request that the motion to dismiss be denied because he
was not served with the motion at the correct address is denied.
denying the motion to quash a bench warrant does not affect the rights of
any party growing out of the final judgment. Thus, it is not a special order
after final judgment. And no other statute or court rule appears to allow an
appeal from the challenged order. See Brown u. MHC Stagecoach, LLC,
(2013) (this court "rnay only consider
appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). As this court lacks
jurisdiction, we grant the motion to dismiss arid
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
(fig' , J.
Cadish
, J.
1;4 , J.
Piaering Herndon
cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge
Gregg Chambers
Cory Reade Dows & Shafer
Eighth District Court Clerk
2
