Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 29, 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-01-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1987

2 state decisions

Relies on 444 So. 2d 947 - Jenkins v. State · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 478 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Jackson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-01-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated because of the trial court’s failure to provide written justification for its departure from the presumptive sentence. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA), aff'd, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla.1985). On remand, we respectfully direct the trial court’s attention to Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985) (inappropriate considerations for departure); and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984) (notice required prior to imposition of costs).

¶2CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.