Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 SO2D 1094 - Schoen v. Gulledge

Schoen v. Gulledge’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably 543 So. 2d 686 - Berner v. Caldwell (1989), Wallace v. Broyles (1998)

2 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

6701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 2001 (Agricultural Credit Act of 1987)

Relies on 409 So. 2d 784 - Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc. · Fulton v. Advertiser Co. · Johnson v. United States Department of Agriculture · 374 So. 2d 298 - Sims v. Lewis · 390 So. 2d 601 - SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'The burden is on one moving for summary judgment to demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact is left for consideration by the jury. The burden does not shift to the opposing party to establish a genuine issue of material fact until the moving party has made a prima facie showing that there is no such issue of material fact. Woodham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co. , 349 So.2d 1110 (Ala. 1977); Shades Ridge Holding Co. v. Cobbs, Allen Hall Mortg. Co. , 390 So.2d 601 (Ala. 1980); Fulton v. Advertiser Co. , 388 So.2d 533 (Ala. 1980).' "”
    52 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.