Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 SO2D 172 - Talley v. Hughes

Talley v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2010

9 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 466 So. 2d 631 - Arrow Fence Co. v. DeFrancesch · 339 So. 2d 335 - Gennuso v. State · 469 So. 2d 1144 - Davis v. Sewerage and Water Bd. · Sherman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. · 406 So. 2d 609 - State, Dept. of Highways v. Landeche

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nonetheless, Talley’s continuing abuse of the judicial process to frustrate execution of the judgment against him must be stopped. We exercise our right to notice on our own motion his failure to disclose causes of action against Hughes. La.C. C.P. Art. 927.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Conclusively shows, however, that Talley knew the homemade trailer was untitled and that he had been actively contesting the matter since October 1982, more than a year prior to institution of his suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[IJnconceivable that during the negotiation and consummation of the sale Talley did not discover, or might not have discovered by ‘simple inspection’, the fact that the trailer had no title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.