Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 481 So. 2d 184 - Frazier v. Freeman

481 So. 2d 184 - Frazier v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably 574 So. 2d 381 - Robertson v. OUR LADY OF LAKE MED. CTR. (1990), 518 So. 2d 1077 - Toups v. Hawkins (1987)

32 state decisions

290198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc. · 418 So. 2d 575 - Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co. · 458 So. 2d 1275 - Carona v. State Farm Ins. Co. · 435 So. 2d 1058 - Asian Intern. v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC. · 450 So. 2d 1014 - Dupuy v. Gonday

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. The plaintiff or defendant in the principal or any incidental action, with or without supporting affidavits, may move for a summary judgment in his favor for all or part of the relief for which he has prayed. . . . . . B. ... The adverse party may serve opposing affidavits prior to the date of the hearing. The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.