481 So. 2d 419 - Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2001
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jizmejian v. United States · Cherek v. United States · Livingston v. Texas · United States v. Haldeman · Brooks v. Tennessee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“received an unfair trial and suffered compelling prejudice against which the trial court was unable to afford protection.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Antagonism of defenses requires severance only where the defenses are so inconsistent that the jury would have to believe one defendant at the expense of the other; the conflict alone establishes the guilt of a defendant.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment, information, or complaint: "(1) If they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction; or "(2) When the several offenses are part of a common conspiracy, scheme, or plan; or "(3) When the several offenses are otherwise so closely connected that it would be difficult to separate proof of one from proof of the other."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.