Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Lockett v. State (1987), 533 So. 2d 1078 - Nixon v. State (1987)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Illinois v. Gates · Minnesota v. Murphy · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 471 So. 2d 332 - Cabello v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Swanier v. State, 473 So.2d 180 (Miss. 1985), this Court stated: The existence of "probable cause" or "reasonable grounds" justifying an arrest without a warrant is determined by factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians act. The determination depends upon the particular evidence and circumstances of the individual cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he prosecution shall disclose to each defendant or to his attorney ... upon request and without further order ... any physical evidence ... to be offered in evidence... . If, subsequent to compliance with these rules or orders pursuant thereto, a party discovers additional material ... which is subject to disclosure, he shall promptly notify the other party of his counsel. .....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“... the court's initial response should be that the defense be given a reasonable opportunity to examine the newly produced documents, photographs, etc.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.