Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

481 So. 2d 991

481 So.2d 991

11 Fla.L.Weekly 262

Sobel v. Goldman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-01-23

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2000

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-01-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The order denying appellants’ motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served on them is a non-final order and is not among those non-final orders which may be appealed. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130. If we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiora-ri, petitioners have not demonstrated any departure from the essential requirements of law, so they are not entitled to certiorari relief.

¶2Appeal DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
/481/so2d/991 · .json · Public domain