Hunt v. Hunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-01-23

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2000

3 state decisions

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · O'Neal v. O'Neal

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-01-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

UPCHURCH, Judge.

¶1This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment of dissolution. We affirm the award of permanent alimony, see O’Neal v. O’Neal, 410 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), but agree that it was error to provide that the husband pay alimony “so long as he shall live or until the Wife shall remarry.” This language is modified to provide that the permanent alimony terminates upon the death of either spouse or the remarriage of the wife, whichever event occurs first. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

¶2As to the other points raised by the parties, we find no error, and affirm.

¶3AFFIRMED as modified.

COBB, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.