Kane v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 1976
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schnautz v. Beto · Williams v. State · Ex Parte Battenfield · 163 Tex. Crim. 53 - Alexander v. State · Ring v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The appellant was apprised of the range of punishment, but nowhere does there appear an inquiry as to whether or not appellant was influenced by any consideration of fear, or by any persuasion, or delusive hope of pardon, which might have prompted him to confess his guilt. Art. 26.13, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. This Court has held this defect to be reversible error on many occasions. Once again, we are forced to recite that this provision of Art. 26.13 is mandatory." (Emphasis supplied.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the exact language of Article 26.13, V.A. C.C.P., be followed in admonishing defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heathcock v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.