In re Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 2013
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States · Hamilton v. Lanning · Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A. · Nowlin v. Peake · Burden v. Seafort (In Re Seafort)
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.