In re Slabbinck’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 329 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In Re Robert J Snyder · Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United States · Gordon v. Hines · Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates · Hessinger & Associates v. U.S. Trustee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he lawyer should have ... given the client the opportunity to seek counsel who may offer representation on other terms. It is not the client's responsibility to know, without it being explained, that adversary proceedings may occur and the consequences arising from them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The level of competency heightens as the complexity and specialized nature of the matter increase.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“i.e. , professionals who provide bankruptcy assistance to consumer debtors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Gomes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.