Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 BR 659 - In re Jackson

In re Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · United States v. International Horizons, Inc. · In Re: Carmen Bateman · Folendore v. U.S. Small Business Administration · Alliance Operating Corporation Highlands Insurance Company Inc v. Alliance Operating Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The filing of an unsecured deficiency claim for the first time after the bar date cannot be an amendment to a timely filed, wholly secured claim; it is a completely new claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the attempt to change the status of a claim from secured to unsecured is not considered an amendment, in the traditional sense, that is to be freely allowed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.