Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 F.2d 210 - The Q-Panel Company v. Stephen E. Newfield

The Q-Panel Company v. Stephen E. Newfield’s Empirical Analysis

482 F.2d 210 · 1973

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
May 2011
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2011

13 federal appellate ·

15019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 285

Relies on Gotthelf v. Commissioner · International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Hardeman · Purer & Co. v. Aktiebolaget Addo · Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such misconduct upon the part of the losing party as to constitute fraud upon the Patent Office or so unfair and reckless as to make it unconscionable for the prevailing party to sustain the expense of counsel.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.