United California Bank v. Fadel’s Empirical Analysis
482 F.2d 274 · 1973
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2019
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7421
Relies on Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Brunsing · Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Dorothy Neal and Nathaniel Neal, Jr., Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Blanche Thomas, Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Wordie Frazier and Prince Frazier · Atkins, Kroll (Guam), Ltd. v. Cabrera · Metal Coating Corp. v. National Steel Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to determine the ownership of funds in a savings account”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.