Friedman v. Meyers’s Empirical Analysis
482 F.2d 435 · 1973
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Securities & Exchange Commission v. Research Automation Corp. (1978), Arizona v. United States District Court (1982)
20 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Snyder v. Harris · Davis v. Alaska · Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. Cauble · Empire Electronics Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(I)ssues are raised as to the state of mind, intent and knowledge of the parties. We have repeatedly stated that summary judgment is particularly inappropriate where, as here, it is sought on the basis of 'the inferences which the parties seek to have drawn (as to) questions of motive, intent, and subjective feelings and reactions.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(s)uspicion will not substitute for knowledge of facts from which fraud could reasonably be inferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.