Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 F.2d 454 - United States v. King

United States v. King’s Empirical Analysis

482 F.2d 454 · 1973

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2007 · most notably United States v. Jenkins (1974), United States v. Doe (1989)

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

1701973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 5033 · 18 U.S.C. § 5034 · 18 U.S.C. § 5035 · 18 U.S.C. § 5037 · 18 U.S.C. § 842

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Kent v. United States · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““District Courts of. the United States shall have jurisdiction of proceedings against juvenile delinquents. For such purposes, the court may be convened at any time and place within the district, in chambers or otherwise. The proceeding shall be without a jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the violation of a law of the United States committed by a person prior to his eighteenth birthday which would have been a crime if committed by an adult.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.