Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

482 F. App'x 857

Bailey v. Braxton

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-10-16

Decided 2012-10-16

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Donald Ray Bailey, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a § 2254 petition and dismissing the case without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Bailey leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. *858Braxton, No. 3:12-cv-00422-JRS (E.D.Va. July 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/482/fappx/857 · .json · Public domain