Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 Mass. 35 - Commonwealth v. Almonor

Commonwealth v. Almonor’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Kyllo v. United States · United States v. White · California v. Greenwood · United States v. Karo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although art. 14 [of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights] and the Fourth Amendment [to the United States Constitution] guard against both, a search and a seizure are distinct legal concepts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “society reasonably expects that the police will not be able to secretly manipulate our personal cell phones for any purpose, let alone for the purpose of transmitting our personal location data”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Cell phones 'physically accompany their users everywhere' such that tracking a cell phone results in 'near perfect surveillance' of its user.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.