Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 Mass. 70 - Commonwealth v. Fredericq

Commonwealth v. Fredericq’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Brown v. Illinois · California v. Hodari D. · United States v. Janis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is the Commonwealth's burden to establish that the evidence it has obtained and intends to use is sufficiently attenuated from the underlying illegality so as to be purged from its taint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “"[w]hen consent to search is obtained through exploitation of a prior illegality, particularly very close in time following the prior illegality, the consent has not been regarded as freely given. Evidence gathered in a search allowed by such a compromised consent has been thought to be tainted and inadmissible."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “entitled to suppress the fruits of that seizure even where the evidence was discovered in places where it is indisputable that the person in question did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.