Commonwealth v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Patane · Goodwin v. Missouri · In re Oliver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant shows that the procedure utilized by police to obtain an identification was unnecessarily suggestive, 'the out-of-court identification is per se excluded as a violation of the defendant's right to due process under art. 12.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.