Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 NW2D 428 - Terrell v. Reinecker

Terrell v. Reinecker’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co. · State v. Murphy · Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Woods · State v. Dvorsky · Miller v. Bonar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This rule is modified somewhat if a legal issue is raised in such a way as to become a necessary operative fact; when however the legal conclusion is a rule of decision to be applied by the judge or jury in deciding the case, it is not a proper subject for expert testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In general an expert witness is not permitted to state a legal conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.