Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 NW2D 774 - State v. Bowers

State v. Bowers’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2018

8 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Swain v. State of Alabama · Powers v. Ohio · Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. · State v. Flores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant argues that the jury could not properly find intent or premeditation because of evidence of his intoxication. Minn. Stat. § 609.075 (1990) provides that ‘when a particular intent or other state of mind is a necessary element to constitute a particular crime, die fact of intoxication may be taken into consideration in determining such intent or state of mind.’ . . . “In this case, the juiy could reasonably believe that defendant acted with intent and premeditation, despite the fact that he had been drinking. . . . Thus, the record contains ample evidence to support the jury’s conclusion that appellant acted with intent and premeditation.” 482 N.W.2d at 778 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “juror cannot try the case impartially and without prejudice,” peremptory challenges may be based on”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sudden impressions, gestures, or a mere feeling,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.