Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 P.3d 1117 - State v. Queen

State v. Queen’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Keel · State v. Godfrey · Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand · Hodges v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant] has not argued . . . that he could meet his burden to establish any of [the Barker] factors”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the district court must extend or continue the time”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “allows for a one-time, 30-day continuance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.