State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ortiz · State v. Phinney · State v. Morton · Smith v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue · 33 Kan. App. 2d 735 - State v. DuMars
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule applies to prevent district court action on remand only when an issue has already been finally settled by earlier proceedings in a case, including issuance of the appellate mandate. If a final settlement of an issue has occurred, the district judge is not free to expand upon or revise that history. The mandate rule does not, however, prevent a district judge from doing whatever else is necessary to dispose of a case. This means the district judge must not only do as the mandate directs; he or she must also do what is needed to settle the other outstanding issues that must be decided to complete district court work on the case. Such issues may have been allocated for decision in the district court in the first place and then untouched by appellate proceedings. They may include issues arising from late-breaking facts. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rodriguez“The mandate rule does not constitute an inflexible jurisdictional barrier to a party's ability to raise a new issue following a remand, but where a remand order is stated in specific terms following deliberate litigation choices by the parties, . . . the parties are not free to endlessly expand on the issues the district court may consider in the absence of new (or newly discovered) facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rodriguez“'Substantial competent evidence is "such legal and relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as being sufficient to support a conclusion.'' [Citation omitted.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Perry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.