Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 So. 2d 1107 - Minor v. State

482 So. 2d 1107 - Minor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably McFee v. State (1987), 857 So. 2d 702 - King v. State (2003)

25 state decisions

120198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 351 So. 2d 1342 - Gray v. State · 463 So. 2d 1064 - Williams v. State · Tubbs v. State · 368 So. 2d 842 - Ramseur v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled in this state that proof of a crime distinct from that alleged in an indictment is not admissible against an accused. There are certain recognized exceptions to the rule. Proof of another crime is admissible where the offense charged and that offered to be proved are so connected as to constitute one transaction, where it is necessary to identify the defendant, where it is material to prove motive and there is an apparent relation or connection between the act proposed to be proved and that charged, where the accusation involves a series of criminal acts which must be proved to make out the offense, or where it is necessary to prove scienter or guilty knowledge, (emphasis added).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[S]ubstantial knowing participation in the consummation of a sale or in arranging for the sale”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... a positive showing of an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.